Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 21:37
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 159
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 493
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.9
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.8
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WL1000GSA6472E 1TB
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 166
Write 147
Mixed 144
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.14
87% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 95%
WDC WD25 00JB-57GVC0 250GB
48GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 25
Write 25.5
Mixed 9.81
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 17.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback