MSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7636
MotherboardMSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '18 at 04:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 355
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1396 MHz, MLim: 1383 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 21.5
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 188
Write 122
Mixed 137
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 12.4
82% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 13.4
23% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
78GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 70.9
Mixed 13.5
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.15
50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
51GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 113
Write 89.8
Mixed 66.1
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.39
78% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-E33(MS-7636) Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback