Lenovo 20252

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20252  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Ginkgo 7A1
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '14 at 17:47
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 111
40% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 147
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 25% Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3808) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3977
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 5.69
4% 5.36 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.57
4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
139GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 265
Write 250
Mixed 185
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 12.8
77% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 31.4
62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0278
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 37.8
Mixed 18.1
37% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.36
82% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB
193GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 33.9
Mixed 29.8
42% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.31
54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 30%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
13GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 5.46
Mixed 7.41
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 1.08
77% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 13%
Typical 20252 Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20252

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback