Mousecomputer Z77H2-A3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMousecomputer Z77H2-A3  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer Z77H2-A3
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 515
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
648GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 408
Mixed 416
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 38.9
131% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 79.2
91% 158 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 133
Mixed 123
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.36
96% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 114%
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB
2TB free, PID 027e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 161
Write 153
Mixed 101
172% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.27
79% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EL64C1D1624Z1 04CB 04CB EL64C1D1624Z1 04CB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77H2-A3 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Mousecomputer Z77H2-A3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback