Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 12:30
Run Duration392 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 74
2-Core 144
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 443
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 38.8
38% 43 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 35.4
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 471
Write 308
Mixed 328
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 15.4
87% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 15.1
18% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 106%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 120
Write 145
Mixed 138
102% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 3.07
4K Mixed 0.39
126% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 92%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
656GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 147
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 2.39
4K Mixed 0.27
126% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 108%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-00MJRA0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 30.2
Mixed 29.9
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.51
107% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 23%
Spaceloop 16GB 16GB
4GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.15
Mixed 4.2
7% 6.93 MB/s
4K Read 2.84
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.005
11% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.4
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback