Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Casper NIRVANA DESKTOP (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER CASPER NIRVANA DESKTOP
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '18 at 21:06
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 195 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 268 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8350 392 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 3510) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.54 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.41 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 143 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 661 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3783 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 661 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 718 (C2) HDA temperature 107 99 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.3% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 100 Mixed 93.2 73% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	7.48% Terrible	Read 35.8 Write 4.24 Mixed 7.25 14% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.67 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.008 22% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.48% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA1339.C8FE 2x2GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 16.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	99x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	53x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	38x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 12,839 samples	37x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 53%, 1,438 samples	21x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 29%, 7,106 samples	17x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16