Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '18 at 23:41
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 457
61% 455 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2346) 2GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 6.59
4% 5.04 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.09
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 324
Mixed 389
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 34.2
152% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 47.1
66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
792GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 155
Mixed 143
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback