Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 465
64% 473 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2346) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 8.72
5% 6.49 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 3.83
4% 4.96 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 144 87 107 103 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 323
Mixed 280
SusWrite 131
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 47.4
185% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 138
131% 202 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
376GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 153 150 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 158
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 152
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback