Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 242 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 476 62% 466 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PwrHis(1787 2346) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.2 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 6.59 4% 5.04 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.04 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 59 56 55 53 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 441 Write 324 Mixed 306 SusWrite 80.3 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 46.7 187% 75.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 85.3 102% 175 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 392GB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 153 152 151 152 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 159 Write 160 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 152 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GB 2,735 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	569x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	391x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	238x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	210x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	100x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	81x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	102x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16