ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL702VSK

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus GL702VSK (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VSK
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170105
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 216 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 597 63% 503 Pts	64-Core 596 37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 1660) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.90 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Lighting 95.4 Reflection 114 Parallax 95 78% 101 fps	MRender 91.8 Gravity 91.6 Splatting 99.3 78% 94.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 1,317 Write 310 Mixed 334 141% 654 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 7.52 68% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 31 DQ Mixed 8.5 30% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 155%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 413GB free Firmware: JB0OA3V0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 141 141 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1746 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 2208 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 649 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 25868 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 219043856412 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	62% Good	Read 114 Write 102 Mixed 104 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 19 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL702VSK Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VSK

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	587x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	584x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	2x
RX 5500-XTAMD $217Bench 51%, 72,993 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	75x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	54x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	43x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	162x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,747 samples	106x
AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBUnknownBench 56%, 159 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback