Asus GL702VSK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VSK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VSK
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170105
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 22:43
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 601
64% 509 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.90
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 115
Parallax 88.3
78% 99.9 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 101
78% 93.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
175GB free
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 518
Mixed 537
186% 857 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 14.7
120% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 12.4
73% 170 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 137%
Great: 155%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3V0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 121
Write 109
Mixed 97.6
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15.9
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VSK Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VSK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback