Lenovo 90H20036US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90H20036US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36D5
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 15:13
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 414
56% 416 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX480
AMD(1002 0C05) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1285 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.8% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 72.9
44% 63.5 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 54.3
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 1TB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 133
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.32
96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90H20036US Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90H20036US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback