Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 19:25
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 234
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 659
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 69
Parallax 59.8
50% 63.5 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 55.3
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 496
Write 401
Mixed 415
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 23.4
138% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 20.6
27% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 118%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
55GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 453
Write 81.3
Mixed 130
48% 222 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 8.7
94% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 11.4
20% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
906GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 143
Mixed 134
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.27
108% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 108
Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
H/W RAID 1 3TB
3TB free, PID null
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 178
Write 130
Mixed 139
184% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.33
73% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
Read 162
Write 148
Mixed 134
187% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.23
99% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback