HP ProLiant MicroServer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProLiant MicroServer  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 14:44
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Neo N54L
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 64.6
34% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 64.8
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 64.4
4% 64.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
451GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 111
Write 115
Mixed 121
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.23
84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST31500341AS 1.5TB
218GB free
Firmware: CC1H
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 96.5
Mixed 103
77% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.28
73% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 70%
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 250GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 81.9
Mixed 91.2
69% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.42
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback