Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 06 '18 at 23:31
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 145-$50
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 52.8
1-Core 17.9
2-Core 16.6
24% 29.1 Pts
4-Core 10.9
8-Core 18.8
2% 14.8 Pts
64-Core 16.7
1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4770
XFX(1682 2900) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 9.69
Parallax 8.78
8% 9.34 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 13.1
8% 9.92 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 250GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 39 30 36 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 21.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 37.5
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 52%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
169GB free
Firmware: 20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 45 41 43 53 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 45.3
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback