| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | HP xw6400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A04h |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090709 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 04 '18 at 20:27 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
|
42%
Average
|
34% 47.8 Pts
|
18% 152 Pts
|
12% 191 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
26% 31.7 fps
|
26% 31.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
552GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
54.7%
Above average
|
66% 88.6 MB/s
|
110% 0.88 MB/s
| |
|
|
73.8%
Very good
|
94% 125 MB/s
|
122% 1.14 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.9%
Very poor
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
7% 2.43 GB/s
|
35% 114 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw6400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 15x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 10x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 235 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 6x |
| Quadro FX 4600NvidiaBench 4%, 1,222 samples | 3x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |