HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP xw6400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090709
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '17 at 01:21
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345 300 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 25.5 2-Core 53.5 34% 48.3 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 185 18% 146 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1454) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.57 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.5 31% 35.6 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 38 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 178231878 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2513 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 33497369 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10842 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1255 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 537985055 (C2) HDA temperature 31 43 55834574879 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 9 178231878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -103130754697289 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3082805438 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4157733182	53.4% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 90.7 Mixed 93.2 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.18 52% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 629GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 166 2258 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2169 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7320 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1408 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2149 (C2) HDA temperature 116 94 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	77.1% Very good	Read 130 Write 138 Mixed 116 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.32 125% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 109%
BUFFALO HD-PCU2 320GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 113GB free, PID 01d9 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 22 Mixed 23.9 31% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.18 41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 5151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	Read 22.8 Write 8.16 Mixed 12.3 16% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.18 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 49GB 1,461 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 8192, 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.9 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 235 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	6x
Quadro FX 4600NvidiaBench 4%, 1,222 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x

SSD
SKC600MS256G 256GBKingstonBench 93%, 190 samples	3x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	3x
60GB 60GBSSDBench 49%, 267 samples	2x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	23x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	15x
37GBUnknownBench 15%, 3,950 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16