Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '16 at 05:21
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 418
56% 421 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 16.9
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 352
Mixed 293
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 24.6
136% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 35.4
76% 155 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
32GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 496
Write 354
Mixed 246
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 20.6
132% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 21.1
63% 135 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 127
Write 65.3
Mixed 6.73
66% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 5.48
4K Mixed 0.43
205% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
205GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 90.3
Write 91.6
Mixed 37.3
89% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB
139GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 15.6
35% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.33
67% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
asmedia ASMT1053 750GB
116GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 37.9
Mixed 8.29
33% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.24
69% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 41%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
88GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 149
Write 155
Mixed 22.5
128% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.21
51% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
31GB free, PID a008
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.2
Mixed 14.2
36% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 1324 F641GU67G1600G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D2V Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D2V - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback