Asus H110M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-D (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '18 at 05:01
Run Duration	579 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 209 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 401 55% 410 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Lighting 9.07 Reflection 7.81 Parallax 9.22 7% 8.7 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 7.17 7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB 5,061 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2102 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1193 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 204 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1048643 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 469 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 84 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4319	76.4% Very good	Read 501 Write 327 Mixed 342 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 9.74 88% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 43.1 91% 188 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 94%
Hds72101 0KLA33R RSD HUA 1TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 276GB free Firmware: GKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 150 (03) Spinup time 99 99 60175614656 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3757 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3832 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1505 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3757 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3757 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 261994577957 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 414	42.2% Average	Read 73.5 Write 73.4 Mixed 67.2 54% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.41 102% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 47%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 143GB free Firmware: JC4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 97 458752 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 121 121 21493711135 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3492 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3374 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1472 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3500 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3500 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 214750003233 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 5 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.1% Above average	Read 104 Write 77.7 Mixed 87.7 68% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.22 54% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 137GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1715 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3025 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1337 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 206 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1508 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86% Excellent	Read 157 Write 143 Mixed 137 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.28 93% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 402GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.4 Mixed 12.7 36% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.41 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 54%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 258GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 34.7 Mixed 25.8 41% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.21 64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB 5,284 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 193GB free, PID 0810 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 12.2 Mixed 15.7 18% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.02 43% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 45%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-001CA0 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 166GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 34.2 Mixed 30 42% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.29 62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 693 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 50GB free, PID b200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 93 Write 94.5 Mixed 22.7 83% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.18 61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 4.51 Mixed 6.88 11% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.13 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.005 16% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax GLJG42F-18KCGA------ 1x8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 10.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-D

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	422x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	241x
Core i5-6400Intel $68Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	220x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	286x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	220x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	197x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	160x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	84x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	59x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16