Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '14 at 01:32
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 121
2-Core 239
82% 180 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 634
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3452) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 0.91
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.23
Reflection 4.15
Parallax 2.88
3% 3.42 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 2.91
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,345
Write 463
Mixed 635
178% 815 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 23.4
128% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 118
172% 321 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 138%
Great: 147%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
422GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 66.9
Write 80.5
Mixed 66.1
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.36
90% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 61%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
54GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 244
Mixed 205
174% 232 MB/s
4K Read 1.64
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.42
161% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 141%
Great: 234%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 22.8
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.42
134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 212%
Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback