Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '14 at 22:23
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 188
65% 143 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 504
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3452) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 0.94
2% 2.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 2.94
3% 3.3 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.78
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 360GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,331
Write 425
Mixed 630
173% 795 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 20.4
114% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 119
160% 293 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 129%
Great: 147%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
422GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 64.4
Write 79.6
Mixed 84.2
58% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.37
80% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 61%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
354GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 163
Mixed 174
126% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.44
135% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 212%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 269
Write 271
Mixed 179
178% 240 MB/s
4K Read 3.33
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.55
244% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 155%
Great: 234%
Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback