Toshiba Satellite L555D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite L555D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NTWAE
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '16 at 02:33
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Mobile M500
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 60
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 65.4
35% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 64.9
8-Core 65.3
9% 65.1 Pts
64-Core 65.7
4% 65.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD M860G with ATI Mobility Radeon 4100
Toshiba(1179 FFA0) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.634.1.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.25
0% 0.61 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 246
Write 97.4
Mixed 109
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 9.79
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 4.35
35% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 28.1
36% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba 8HTF12864HDY-800G1 64T128020EDL2.5C2 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L555D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L555D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback