Toshiba Satellite L555D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba Satellite L555D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA NTWAE
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 18 '17 at 04:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Mobile M500
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 11.2
2-Core 14.6
13% 17.1 Pts
4-Core 16.3
8-Core 21.3
2% 18.8 Pts
64-Core 20.4
1% 20.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon 4100
Toshiba(1179 FFA0) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.65
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.34 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.42 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.27%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2250BH G2 250GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00400018 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 77.1
Write 66.5
Mixed 70
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.26
79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Toshiba 8HTF12864HDY-800G1 64T128020EDL2.5C2 3GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.67% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 1.17 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.67%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L555D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L555D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback