Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3162-A1
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121217
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '18 at 17:04
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 190 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 372 50% 372 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.38 2% 1.65 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1020 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 710 (E8) Unknown 100 100 8716209102 (E9) Unknown 99 0 99	83% Excellent	Read 458 Write 379 Mixed 395 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 30.4 102% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 94.2 104% 176 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 104%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 183 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 31 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 58 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 29 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 30 (C2) HDA temperature 104 102 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	93.1% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 169 Mixed 166 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.99 4K Mixed 0.44 145% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 112%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB 352 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 0GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 45 Write 37.4 Mixed 32.2 47% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.45 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 1.29 117% 2.76 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB 2,147 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E910 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E910

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	96x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	17x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	61x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	16x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 98%, 656 samples	4x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 20GBUnknownBench 54%, 9 samples	4x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $89

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16