Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 02:14
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 113
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 693
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Lighting 81.6
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 104
66% 81.3 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 74.9
58% 70 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 485
Write 138
Mixed 196
59% 273 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 11.6
96% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 19
33% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 169
Mixed 146
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.27
130% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
794GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 138
Write 109
Mixed 108
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.41
119% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
94GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 74.9
Mixed 67.2
51% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.48
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
34GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 73.7
Mixed 81.5
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 70%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 110
158% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.28
96% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33.4
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 27.2
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback