Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 670
70% 561 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 58.1
Parallax 104
66% 81.1 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 74.9
58% 69.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 511
Write 127
Mixed 185
59% 274 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 17
98% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 41.5
53% 93.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 168
Mixed 152
129% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.27
130% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
794GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 158
Write 108
Mixed 92
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.36
119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
94GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 72.6
Mixed 66.6
50% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.38
96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
34GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50% Average
Read 100
Write 73.9
Mixed 81.6
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.53
107% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50%
Great: 70%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 110
159% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.48
4K Mixed 0.28
97% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback