Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151117
Uptime26.6 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 09:50
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 180
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 518
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.6
32% 35.1 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 35.1
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 476
Write 240
Mixed 252
71% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 20.7
93% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 12.5
16% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 95%
I-O DATA HDCN-U 1TB
28GB free, PID 011c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 39.7
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $803
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback