Apple iMac18,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac18,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-77F17D7DA9285301
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2304 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '18 at 19:24
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 218
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 427
57% 427 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555
Apple(106B 016B) 2GB
CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 1280 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 22.6
15% 21 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 24
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB5N0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 90.6
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.18
63% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
8GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.1
Write 5.48
Mixed 5.09
10% 9.88 MB/s
4K Read 4.78
4K Write 3,510
179,131% 1,758 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D413831475336414652384E2D554820202020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 24.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,2 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac18,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback