Gilardoni Unità Logica FEP ME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGilardoni Unità Logica FEP ME  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DG31PR
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20090421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '18 at 22:11
Run Duration857 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 18.1
2-Core 35.8
30% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 46
8-Core 48.1
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 47.6
3% 47.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Matrox M9120 PCIe x16
Device(102B 2100) 512MB
Driver: MxMUm.dll Ver. 2.4.3.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.2 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 0
Splatting 0
0% 0 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.09%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASD25-MLC128G-CT 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PMB3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
Read 166
Write 141
Mixed 137
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 5.44
37% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 9.77
12% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
152GB free
Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 29.9
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.56
108% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 74%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
617GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 27.8
Mixed 16.7
31% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
hp v115p 8GB
1GB free, PID 3d07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 9.71
Mixed 8.08
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.67
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.009
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback