ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gilardoni Unità Logica FEP ME

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gilardoni Unità Logica FEP ME (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DG31PR
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20090421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '18 at 22:26
Run Duration	641 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54 8,325 User benchmarks, average bench 33% J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 45.2 32% 44.5 Pts	4-Core 48.9 8-Core 47.6 6% 48.2 Pts	64-Core 36.1 2% 36.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Matrox M9120 PCIe x16 21 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(102B 2100) 512MB Driver: MxMUm.dll Ver. 2.4.3.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.09% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.2 fps	MRender 0 Gravity 0.03 Splatting 0 0% 0.01 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.09% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ASD25-MLC128G-CT 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: PMB3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3114 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 806 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	27.8% Poor	Read 161 Write 135 Mixed 142 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 8.17 40% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.2 DQ Write 41.7 DQ Mixed 10.5 13% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 152GB free Firmware: KC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 1576 (03) Spinup time 100 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4124 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 114894175 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10097 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1476 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 9 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 705757226 (C2) HDA temperature 42 50 51539607594 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 28 1576 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 76403173238385 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4165166672 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3351408723	67.5% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 30 64% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.55 110% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 74%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 612GB free, PID 2339 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 28.4 Mixed 16.3 31% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.38 88% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 21%
hp v115p 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 3d07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 6.74 Mixed 10.9 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback