Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 18:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 130
58% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 354
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.2
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 17
17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 280
Write 114
Mixed 161
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 15.4
76% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 67.8
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 30.6
40% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
232GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 140
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A160 CMV4GX3M1A133 8GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback