Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 742
79% 628 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 112
Reflection 120
Parallax 108
91% 113 fps
Gravity 98.9
Splatting 80.7
78% 89.8 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
191GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 673
Write 425
Mixed 512
119% 537 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 18
112% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 77.5
122% 228 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,092
Write 1,251
Mixed 1,205
334% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 35.6
210% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 61.4
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 26.7
45% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 226%
Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 521
Write 187
Mixed 207
66% 305 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 12.3
124% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 11.4
57% 131 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
5GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 409
Mixed 419
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 30.4
164% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 48.6
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 104
73% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 135
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.19
104% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
159GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 124
Mixed 117
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.22
72% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 114%
Kingston SH103S3120G 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1634 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback