Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 16:27
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 744
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 19.4
16% 20 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 49
Splatting 33.8
27% 32.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
191GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 429
Mixed 459
115% 521 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 15.4
111% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 15.1
66% 136 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,988
Write 1,178
Mixed 1,150
317% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 35.3
196% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 26.8
118% 269 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 226%
Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 499
Write 197
Mixed 186
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 15.7
130% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 14.3
53% 118 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
5GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 414
Mixed 419
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 30
169% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 30.3
64% 122 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 158
Write 143
Mixed 140
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.28
113% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
159GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 129
Mixed 122
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.24
70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 114%
Kingston SH103S3120G 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1634 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.9
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback