Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 07:57
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 739
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1655 MHz, MLim: 1804 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 124
Parallax 122
91% 119 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 106
Splatting 95.6
82% 101 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
210GB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 715
Write 419
Mixed 510
121% 548 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 23
119% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 85.8
125% 229 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,223
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,191
342% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 42.4
215% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 26.8
120% 275 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 246%
Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 524
Write 164
Mixed 186
63% 291 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 21
132% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 9.04
57% 131 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 87%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
5GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 409
Mixed 421
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 49.7
194% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 29.4
103% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 153
Mixed 138
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
159GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 139
Write 133
Mixed 124
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 114%
Kingston SH103S3120G 240GB
107GB free
Firmware: 507KC4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
PNY USB 3.0 FD 256GB
28GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 42.9
Write 42.6
Mixed 9.37
37% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.91
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.16
27% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1603 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback