Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 26 '18 at 05:57
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 120
55% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 336
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 52.4
33% 43.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 42.3
30% 36 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
149GB free
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 514
Write 460
Mixed 468
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 13.9
74% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 14.3
41% 88 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76%
Great: 111%
Kingston SHSS37A120G 120GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 490
Write 229
Mixed 267
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 13.4
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 13.8
38% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
582GB free
Firmware: 81.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 87.9
Mixed 94.8
69% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.29
102% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
469GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 97.8
Write 48.3
Mixed 66.5
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.14
58% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
242GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 133
Mixed 128
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.31
117% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92%
Great: 109%
Imation Nano Pro 16GB
15GB free, PID 063e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.6
Mixed 4.87
8% 8.05 MB/s
4K Read 4.84
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.005
18% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback