HP h8-1392d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive16.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1392d  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory3.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '18 at 13:30
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 520
60% 466 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 2319) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 5.25
6% 6.85 fps
MRender 8.86
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 790GB
527GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.8% Very poor
Read 90.7
Write 85.9
Mixed 79.8
19% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 6.76
32% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 7.24
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 1.35
4% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Virtual Disk 120GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 86.2
Mixed 85.5
16% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 6.11
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 7.37
8% 12 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 20%
PI-210 USB 2.0 Drive 120GB
18GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 23.4
Mixed 10.1
25% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.18
44% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1392d Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP h8-1392d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback