ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3492AB8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 3492AB8 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121012
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '18 at 14:30
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470S 14,631 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 181 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 349 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 308C) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.38 2% 1.66 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 2432 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1814 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 80 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 692348844 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27571 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1802 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 51 639041573 (C2) HDA temperature 37 49 73014444069 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 55 31 2432 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -43194486068299 (F1) Unknown 100 253 200769277 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3718585873	42.7% Average	Read 76.2 Write 72.6 Mixed 67.1 54% 72 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.66 117% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 88%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 1TB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 931GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 25 Mixed 25.8 34% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.36 89% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 69%
Prolific ATAPI-6 Bridge C 1.5TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 732GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 25.1 Mixed 27.7 34% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.31 47% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 3492AB8 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Lenovo 3492AB8

CPU
Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples	1x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 04CB 12GBSamsungBench 41%, 19 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback