Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '18 at 03:45
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 255
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 1080
96% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 60.7
50% 63.5 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 53.2
49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,776
Write 1,371
Mixed 1,254
326% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 33.6
164% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 21.8
101% 230 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 218%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 493
Write 344
Mixed 351
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 23
111% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 70.2
92% 164 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 118
Mixed 81.1
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.87
135% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 173%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 183
Mixed 176
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 3.68
4K Mixed 0.42
157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0108
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 79.1
73% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 4.97
4K Mixed 0.46
183% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 66%
WDC WD30 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 3TB
1TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 117
Write 162
Mixed 126
181% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.3
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 15.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 11
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback