Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 148 59% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 294 39% 295 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% PNY(196E 0995) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 24.1 Parallax 31 20% 26.7 fps	MRender 32.3 Gravity 28.3 Splatting 25 23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128 128GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8L1Q Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 261 Write 255 Mixed 239 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 9.84 67% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 10.8 30% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 49%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 1A01 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.7% Very good	Read 169 Write 95.5 Mixed 114 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.15 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.33 104% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 1x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373