ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4286A59

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 4286A59 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 4286A59
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180621
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 09:58
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 132 60% 96.3 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 196 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PA128 128GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 4.6 11 9.4 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 6.8 Write 45 Mixed 18 SusWrite 9.6 4% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 14.7 33% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 22.4 33% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 49%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 63GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 6GB free Firmware: 01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 20 18 20 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 18.4 16% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 33%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB 3,948 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 7.2 7.7 7.4 8.1 7.3 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Read 20 Write 9.5 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 7.3 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.8 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback