| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130712 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '18 at 21:46 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
59.6%
Above average
|
60% 103 Pts
|
40% 317 Pts
|
24% 388 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 6850
Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
14% 15.1 fps
|
12% 13.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
79.4%
Very good
|
86% 390 MB/s
|
104% 34.2 MB/s
|
88% 154 MB/s
|
|
|
68%
Good
|
90% 119 MB/s
|
72% 0.82 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 075D GR1333D364L9/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
21.1%
Poor
|
20% 6.87 GB/s
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
41% 98.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 65x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 58x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 45x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 24x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
| 850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $333 |