Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 12:03
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7350K-$42
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 147
2-Core 263
95% 169 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 403
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 23.20.16.4901
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 7.84
6% 9.12 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 16.4
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 118
Parallax 101
93% 111 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 102
Splatting 99.5
82% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 497
Write 274
Mixed 279
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 7.75
82% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 36.3
74% 153 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
342GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 104
Mixed 98.1
75% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.43
104% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
230GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 144
Write 127
Mixed 112
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 28
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 21.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback