Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '18 at 16:24
Run Duration	465 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7350K-$40 4,002 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 151 2-Core 271 97% 173 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 400 54% 405 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4055 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1478 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 180 180 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 440 (C2) HDA temperature 70 57 184684576798	63.9% Good	Read 494 Write 267 Mixed 280 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 7 83% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 30.2 45% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 342GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 154677295 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4134 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 4510770519 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11039 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3894 (B7) Unknown 79 79 21 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 98 133146542145 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 538902560 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 51539607584 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 33 28 154677295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 52 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -97886599622288 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1403858903 (F2) Unknown 100 253 888100371	56.8% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 102 Mixed 102 75% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 230GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 63 223292776 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1481 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 23620221 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2566 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 938 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 59 555614239 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1485 (C2) HDA temperature 31 13 55834574879 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 223292776 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -83219286324789 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7607450619 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14460572700	68.8% Good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 119 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.17 58% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 113%
Generic- MS/MS-Pro 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 5GB free, PID null Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Read 13.3 Write 4.21 Mixed 5.02 8% 7.51 MB/s	4K Read 2.26 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 9% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 7%
Integral 360 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Read 16 Write 5.83 Mixed 8.03 11% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 6.37 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.07 30% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 29.6 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 36.5 SC Mixed 28.8 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 50.5 79% 50.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1,778x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	541x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	276x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	457x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	352x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	245x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	172x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	162x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	73x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	175x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	117x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	99x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $738

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16