MSI A55M-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A55M-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 22:18
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 29.2
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 59.4
23% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 54.3
8% 58.8 Pts
64-Core 35.4
2% 35.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 86.2
21% 58.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 54.4
49% 60.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 98.3
Mixed 97.6
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.21
54% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
15GB free
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 74.5
Write 69.6
Mixed 80.3
57% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.39
69% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-E35 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback