MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '24 at 11:28
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
66% 119 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 310
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 60%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 216
Parallax 210
152% 204 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 158
Splatting 140
134% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 137%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 4TB
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.W.J.E4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,353
Write 1,785
Mixed 1,529
350% 1,555 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 50.1
168% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 637
474% 637 MB/s
Poor: 169% Great: 567%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
358GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 327
Write 313
Mixed 275
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 33.6
114% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 214
160% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
kingston Flash Disk 34GB
30GB free, PID 2018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 151
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
36% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 74.4
4K Mixed 0
414% 37.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback