Lenovo 20MAS35T0E

Performance Results

Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20MAS35T0E  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MAS35T0E
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 08:38
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 210
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 563
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0428A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1426 1420 1422 1440 1416 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,778
Write 1,466
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 1,417
325% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 24.2
119% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 593
458% 630 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 222%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 0443 RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 0443 RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 0443 RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN40BA
Typical 20MAS35T0E Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20MAS35T0E

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback