HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8427
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 11:03
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 225
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 517
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630
HP(103C 8427) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 31
Parallax 8.6
5% 15.3 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.5
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H1 1TB
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA72H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 1730 1021 1165 1238 1089 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1048
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 1,353
279% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 73.9
214% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 938
708% 954 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 235%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback