Lenovo 10FGS25800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FGS25800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 17:50
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 154
57% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 346
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W4300
HP(103C 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.2
9% 17.6 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 20
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 298
Write 261
Mixed 199
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 16.6
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 207
169% 243 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
157GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.8
Write 76.7
Mixed 30.7
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5786
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.7
Write 15.7
Mixed 9
18% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 6.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 12% 34 200 55 100 21.5" 1920 1009 MSI30B9 MSI MP223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback