MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 01:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 110
50% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 218
23% 185 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.7
1% 2.43 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1032 1TB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11111000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,607
Write 1,442
Mixed 1,386
330% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 36.9
118% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 281
208% 280 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 322%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
1TB free, PID 0826
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 119 111 121 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 142
Write 137
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 120
135% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 029E CMSX16GX4M1A3200C22 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 120 15.5" 1536 793 AUOD0ED
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback