MSI MS-B9201

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Trident3 (MS-B920)
MotherboardMSI MS-B9201  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190821
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '23 at 22:30
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 478
56% 436 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 48.6
45% 53.3 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 44
36% 43.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
708GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 919
Write 792
Mixed 731
181% 814 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 49.1
145% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,031
DQ Write 685
DQ Mixed 882
652% 866 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 40.1
13% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 029E CMSX16GX4M1A3200C22 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-B9201 Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-B9201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback